Science Fiction has taken on a whole new meaning with the inauguration of Donald Trump. Once again we’re in the realms of presidential confabulation matching the aspirations of Ronald Reagan when he took the ultimate ‘high ground’ with his doomed Star Wars initiative. This time, however, it’s not missile killing satellites, rather the fictions that Trump is spinning around global warming that need to have light shone upon them.
A Chinese hoax, the erosion of American jobs and tax dollars being fed into United Nation’s climate change programmes, just a “bullshit” [sic] theory… Trump’s general opposition is well recorded, in spite of such visual evidence as yet another massive chunk of the Antarctic ice shelf breaks free. What has changed now that he’s taken office, are his ploys and personnel appointments in order to help sell these fictions to the American people. Admittedly, this might all just be a tactic of his destabilising rhetoric, but it’s still disturbing to hear evidence of what’s already been put in place.
October 2016 saw him appoint climate change skeptic Myron Ebell to oversee the transitional efforts at the Environmental Protection Agency. In the meantime, the president’s belief in ‘clean coal’ – i.e. a process where all harmful emissions generated by energy production are completely neutralised – is pure Sci-Fi. The technology doesn’t currently exists and ongoing research projects have been plagued by delays and financial overspends. Then we have Trump’s claims that US wind farms are manufactured abroad and are lethal to local bird populations – both accusations countered in a recent Huffington Post story.
NASA plays a pivotal role in the data capture on climate change, and while Trump’s transitional team heading into that organisation aren’t as divisive as Myron Ebell, there is an indication that environmental data will be ‘revised’. Thankfully, as reported in Wired, a group of activists were already on the case nullifying such a revisionist approach by data mining numerous government pages.
So science and fiction merging in the most insidious manner, which could well add to an increasing despondency in any readership. But, as relayed in one of November’s posts, we’ve spent too long retreating into our virtual playgrounds. Thankfully, there are plenty of opportunities to channel our collective interests in the future into actions that may actually help shape it.